Why the Criminal Trespassing charges should have never made it to court.

I have a good friend who is a police officer, I talked to him about the charges that Beverly placed on me and he laughed and laughed.  He pointed out that it's not criminal if you were invited over there.  It isn't criminal if you were going over just to talk.  Then he pointed out I have to be given a reasonable time to leave etc.

He then went on to say that if one person invited me, the other one can't throw me off.  He had a lot more fun with that part of it.

As for going over there just to talk.  Even Richard Clapp, the person that said there was a probable cause for those charges asked me why I went over there when Cheryl was not there.  That was an item that didn't make sense because he was trying to fit it in with the other lies that Beverly had stated to the neighbors and the police officers and as you will find out, everybody she worked with at the courthouse also.

It was clear Richard Clapp didn't realize that the statement, made to the police officers, was entirely bogus and it would be used in a later jury trial to show Beverly Rusk has lied under oath.  Note: All that is needed is prior inconsistent statements, the courts don't care which one is wrong.

As for items that Richard Coppula, the prosecuting attorney in the "Criminal Trespassing" charge,  told me.  After Richard Coppula lost his license to practice law, he was home a lot.  I called him and spoke to him quite a few times.  I knew I would get some information out of him.

People have an overwhelming urge to brag.  He asked me why I didn't point out that Cheryl was not over there at the time.  He knew if I'd brought that up, it would have completely destroyed the states case.  The letter, that Beverly had Frank Fuhr write, only pertained to Cheryl and not anybody else.

I have a few things to say about that falsified letter.

Richard then laughed and pointed out to me, that the jury believes what they want to believe.  He also pointed out that they all know 'Bev' at the courthouse.  He made it very clear that the reason Judge Brinn did not throw the case out was because he was on a first name basis with 'Bev.'

That would explain why Judge Brinn didn't ask me questions about why I did things.  When we were in his chambers afterward, I wanted to talk, all he said to me was "If you want a retrial I'll grant you that."  I know now that it was because he had been infected by Beverly's lies.

Right before the "Telephone Harassment" trial, years later, I asked the judge if he had heard any of the stories Beverly Rusk had been telling about me.  I had to make sure that would not happen a second time..

Back to the "Trespassing charge."  The attorney I hired to defend me was Beatrice Trujillo.  I wanted a female attorney.  Her brother Joe, lost his license to practice law because of something he did in the Probate court.  Beverly worked in the Probate Court.   Every body knew that they knew each other and it was a clearly a conflict of interest, and he should have not taken my money, but nobody said anything.

That would explain why I could never talk to Beatrice, the attorney I actually hired or to Joe.  It was because they only listened to Beverly's side of the story.  I'm still mad about that because of the trick they used in court later to keep the $300 that I paid them.  They made it look like they were doing their best to keep me out of jail.  Good grief!

I could state items about what happened at the house, but I want to leave it with it should have never gone to court in the first place.